Powered By UNISYS
( Click to Close )
Maui    News & Information Hub
HEADLINE NEWS Weekly Newsletter
News

Maui Budget Committee Reviews Real Property Tax Valuations

Share |
   April 21st, 2014 · 2 Disqus Comments ·
Facebook Comments
· Maui News
Mike White. File image by Wendy Osher.

Mike White. File image by Wendy Osher.

By Wendy Osher

Maui County’s revenue from real property tax is projected to be $261 million, up $36 million over last year, if the mayor’s proposed rates are adopted for the Fiscal Year 2014 Budget, according to an announcement made by Budget and Finance Committee Chair Mike White.

White said the committee today discussed revenue projections upon receipt of a certified list of the net taxable value of real property in the county from the director of finance.  

According to White, the list shows a $36.35 billion valuation, up $2.84 billion from the year before.

“With property valuations increasing, taxpayers will need to pay higher property taxes, even without an increase in real property tax rates,” White said in a committee press release. “It’s critical the committee understand how these rising valuations will impact the county’s revenue stream before we consider increasing tax rates across the board.”

Real property taxes are considered the county’s largest revenue source, according to White.

In addressing committee members today, Scott Teruya, administrator for the Real Property Tax Division at the Department of Finance said, “60% of our homeowners have a net taxable value of less than $250,000, and are paying less than $765 for their annual property tax.”

Chair White took time to explain how the committee addressed the issue in previous years saying, “For three years the administration came to us with the concept of revenue neutrality — that was in order to increase tax rates so that the county wouldn’t lose all the funds they needed with which to operate.”

White used fiscal year 2010 as a base year for comparison for actual taxation, and what it would have been had the rates been left unchanged.

“Had we left the rates the same, with a drop in values, we would have lost roughly $28 million; however, we increased tax rates, and by doing so, the shortfall was only $17 million. So that year was a $10,271,000 tax increase, or approximately 5%,” he said.

Based on the baseline, White said, “Revenues in 2012 would have dropped by $47.9 million, but with the increase in rates, we only lost $23.7 [million].  Basically, that year was an effective tax increase of $24 million or 13.1%.”

“What it boils down to is that … with this year’s values, and applying the 2010 rates, we’re effectively paying taxes of about $58 million more than we would had we stayed at the 2010 rates.  So, over the last four fiscal years, the revenue neutrality, and the tax increases from last year have resulted in us asking the community for approximately $165 million that we would not have gotten had the rates simply stayed the same,” said White.

White said the reason rates are moved is because of a need to reflect financial needs. “At the same time, the fact that we have reached out to the community and asked for more money, I’m a little concerned has made us feel like we’ve got more to spend — hence some of the sizable increases we’re facing,” said White.

“I share these three items with you just simply for you to use in your own thoughts and deliberations,” he said. “We have asked the community to step forward when values dropped by increasing the rates. Now the values are going back up.”

He posed the question, “Is it consistent for us to turn around and say, well, values are going up so now we can take the value increase and add a tax increase on top of that?”

“I know that the public is watching what we are doing, and we’ve all heard that nobody is terribly excited about raising taxes,” White said prior to adjourning the committee meeting.

The committee is scheduled to head out to a public hearing in Hāna on Tuesday, April 22 at 6 p.m.; and then resume committee deliberations in the council chamber at 10 a.m on Wednesday, April 23, 2014.

Sign Up To Our Weekly Newsletter 2 Disqus Comments
Facebook Comments
    Recommend This Article
    Related Stories

    Tags

    Comments
Editor's Note:Maui Now is an open forum and we welcome any views. However, please apply your sense of aloha when posting comments - remarks that are unnecessarily offensive will be blocked.

 
By publishing a comment, you are acknowledging that you are personally responsible for its contents.

  • Observer

    It seems to me that, in keeping with the administration’s professed policy of “revenue neutrality,” if property values are rising again, tax rates should go back down in exact proportion to the previous increase.; otherwise, it is inflation rather than neutrality and the public will feel they have been tricked.

    As David White points out, the County felt it had more to spend so they were less frugal with the funds than they should have been and now they want more. They expanded their budgets instead of saving to offset the next drop in values. Basic expenses on Maui – gas, food, water, electricity, housing – are already making people homeless. Does anyone consider it good governance to impose on the residents unnecessarily just because they can?

  • Locomoco

    I for one am sick of the County and the State raising taxes and fees on hardworking families who are barely making ends meet. Everything, and I mean everything, costs more than it did a year ago, but nobody is getting raises except for politicians and government workers. At some point the golden goose–the taxpayer–is going to die from starvation. Then these self-entitled politicians and government workers might actually have to work for a living.


Loading Facebook Comments