Maui News

INOUYE TESTIFIES ON AKAKA BILL & STATUS OF NATIVE HAWAIIAN RECOGNITION

Play
Listen to this Article
5 minutes
Loading Audio... Article will play after ad...
Playing in :00
A
A
A

U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye offered testimony today in support of the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act, also known as the Akaka Bill.

inouye_fullIn his address during today’s hearing, Inouye said that reconciliation is long overdue.

As one who has served the citizens of Hawaii for over 50 years, as a member of the Territorial Legislature, a member of Congress, and now a member of the United States Senate, I believe that there is broad based support in our State for what the Native people are seeking, full restoration of the government to government relationship they had with the United States,” said Inouye.

Inouye went on to say that there has always been an understanding that Native Hawaiian people have a status that is unique in the state.  “Even after the Native Hawaiian government was illegally overthrown, the Native Hawaiian people never gave up their expression of political status through the Royal Societies and later through the Hawaiian Civic clubs,” Inouye said.

Below is a complete transcript of Inouye’s testimony:

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD

STATEMENT OF SENATOR DANIEL K. INOUYE BEFORE THE AUGUST 6, 2009 HEARING ON S. 1011:  THE NATIVE HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT

I would like to thank Chairman Dorgan and Vice Chairman Barasso for scheduling this important hearing today on a bill that Senator Akaka and I have worked tirelessly on for the past 10 years.

So much of what we are here to consider today arises from events that took place long ago. On January 16, 1895, the United States Minister John L. Stevens, who served as the Ambassador to the court of Queen Liliuokalani, directed a marine company on board the U.S.S. BOSTON to arrest and detain Queen Liliuokalani.

She was placed under house arrest in her bedroom at Iolani Palace for nine months.  This event was engineered and orchestrated by the Committee of Public Safety, which consisted of Hawaii’s non-Native Hawaiian businessmen, and with the approval of Minister Stevens.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD

President Grover Cleveland appointed James Blount to conduct a special investigation in Hawaii and write up his findings.  His report was the first report that provided “evidence that officially identified the United States’ complicity in the lawless overthrow of the lawful, peaceful government of Hawaii.”  In contrast to the Blount report a year later the Senator John T. Morgan, Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations also issued an investigative report that said the United States did no wrong.  This was clearly written to exonerate the parties involved.

On January 17, 1895, Queen Liliuokalani temporarily yielded her authority to the United States.  A new government, the Republic of Hawaii, was established and requested annexation by the United States.  But after examining the circumstances and events leading to the illegal overthrow, President Cleveland refused to annex the Republic.  In 1898, President McKinley, unable to obtain the necessary Senate consent to ratify a treaty of annexation, signed a Joint Resolution annexing Hawaii as a United States’ territory.

As part of the annexation agreement, former crown lands were transferred to the United States.  Discussions on the status of Native Hawaiians immediately began throughout Hawaii, for this was their land, their government, and their people, but they were now outcasts.  In 1921, Hawaii’s delegate to Congress, Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalanianaole, led Congress in enacting the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920.  In adopting this Act, Congress compared its relationship with Native Hawaiians to its relationship with Indian tribes and relied on this special relationship to return certain crown lands to the Territory for the benefit of Native Hawaiians.

For those of us born and raised in Hawaii, as I was, we have always understood that the Native Hawaiian people have a status that is unique in our State.  This status is enshrined in our State Constitution and is reflected in the laws of our State.  It is found in well over 188 federal statutes including the Hawaii Admissions Act.  This unique status reflects our deep gratitude to the native people who first welcomed us to their shores and who gave us the opportunity to live in their traditional homelands.

Mr. Chairman, in my 30 years of service on this committee, I have been fortunate to learn a bit about the history of our country and its relations with the indigenous, native people, who occupied and exercised sovereignty on this continent.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW AD

As a nation we have changed course many times in the policies governing our dealings with Native people.  We began with treaties with native people, and then we turned to war.  We enacted laws recognizing Native governments, and then we passed laws terminating our relationships with those governments. We repudiated our termination policy and restored our relationships with Native governments.  Finally for the last 39 years we adopted a policy of recognizing and supporting the rights of this nation’s First Americans to self-determination and self-governance.  We have been firm in our resolve to uphold that policy.

Native Hawaiians have had a political and legal relationship with the United States for the past 183 years as shown through treaties with the United States and other sovereign governments and entities, and scores of federal statutes.  But like tribes whose federally recognized status was terminated, Hawaii’s monarchy was also terminated.  Even after the Native Hawaiian government was illegally overthrown, the Native Hawaiian people never gave up their expression of political status through the Royal Societies and later through the Hawaiian Civic clubs.  Through these groups cultural, political, social and activities and relationships unique to the Native Hawaiian people were kept in tact.

As one who has served the citizens of Hawaii for over 50 years, as a member of the Territorial Legislature, a member of Congress, and now a member of the United States Senate, I believe that there is broad based support in our State for what the Native people are seeking, full restoration of the government to government relationship they had with the United States.

Lastly, the courts have concluded that termination can only be reversed by an act of Congress.  Reconciliation is long overdue and I look forward to continuing to work with the Administration and my colleagues to ensure that the Native Hawaiian people are given their right to self-determination and self-governance back.

(Posted by Wendy Osher, Information provided by the Office of U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye)

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored Content

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay in-the-know with daily or weekly
headlines delivered straight to your inbox.
Cancel
×

Comments

This comments section is a public community forum for the purpose of free expression. Although Maui Now encourages respectful communication only, some content may be considered offensive. Please view at your own discretion. View Comments