Internet Tracking Bill Deferred Over Privacy Predicament

January 27, 2012, 6:39 AM HST · Updated January 27, 3:13 PM
0 Comments
×

Screen save image from Google search on internet privacy.

By Wendy Osher

A House Committee yesterday voted to defer a bill that sought internet tracking of consumer records for at least 2 years after hearing overwhelming testimony against it.

Among those testifying against the bill was Kate Dean, the Executive Director for the US Internet Service Provider Association.

In written testimony, Dean stated that HB2288 is too broad and raises a myriad of privacy concerns.

SPONSORED VIDEO

She further stated that mandatory data retention would present complex challenges and risks including regulatory burdens, technical complications, capital expense, and diversion from innovation.

The bill, introduced by lead sponsor Rep. John Mizuno of Oahu, would have required record keeping of an individual’s internet browsing history including each subscriber’s internet destination, protocol address, and domain name.

Others providing testimony against the item included officials with the telecommunications industry including T-Mobile USA and Hawaiian Telcom who stated that implementation and compliance of such a storage system would have a significant impact to the companies.

Ken Hiraki, Vice President of Government Affairs for Hawaiian Telcom also cited concerns over privacy, international law, and security.

Testimony was also received from internet service providers who say the bill raises serious privacy concerns, and enable government to investigate a users’ online activity without a warrant or court ordered subpoena.

A request for comment from Rep. Mizuno on Thursday was not returned or available at the time of this posting.

An individual writing in support of the measure said it would help to provide better protection for citizens that are the subject of cyber bullying and harassment; and provide critical information to police officers investigating allegations of cyber crimes, enabling them to prosecute offenders.

The testifier said, “because cybercrime is a recent phenomenon, in many cases Hawaii’s penal code does not provide law enforcement the necessary authority to investigate and prosecute offenders.”

Rep. Mizuno also introduced an internet crime bill this week that would increase penalties for computer fraud, and seeks to establish criminal laws for prohibited web designs.

Print

Share this Article

    View Categories
    Promote Your Maui Business for Free Add Your Listing

    Weekly Newsletter

    ARTICLE COMMENTS ( 0 )
    This comments section is a public community forum for the purpose of free expression. Although Maui Now encourages respectful communication only, some content may be considered offensive. Please view at your own discretion.

    I Understand, Show Comments